Lowry, L. (2002). The
giver. New York: Laurel-Leaf Books.
I decided to read this
book, because I have never had the opportunity to do so. It’s almost
embarrassing to admit it, because it’s such a classic and very well known. It even
earned the Newberry Medal for being an excellent contribution to children’s
literature.
This story fits within the
science fiction genre. Though
the events are imaginative in nature, they could actually happen. Additionally,
it touches on the topic of mind control, which is popular in books of this
genre (Brown, Tomlinson, & Short, 2011). The story was written in third person, but we cannot see
into the minds of all the characters. Instead, we can really only see inside
Jonas’ mind—understanding his every thought, fear, worry, and desire (limited omniscient).
Additionally, we come to understand that he is in conflict with society (person-against-society). When he is
selected as the Receiver of Memory, he begins to realize that the community’s effort
to achieve “sameness” is preventing the people from truly living and
experiencing real emotions. For that reason, he desires to make a change. Ultimately,
he decides to escape the community, which forces the people to experience the
memories he held for them.
I definitely enjoyed reading
this story, and found myself completely immersed in Jonas’ life as a
twelve-year-old boy in a society that strived for “sameness”. This was all in
an effort to prevent pain and suffering in the lives of the residents. Because
of this, though, they led lives absent of true emotion. One of my favorite
moments of the entire book is when the Giver transmits the memory of a family
gathered around a Christmas tree opening presents. For the first time, Jonas
experiences real love, and he finds himself wishing that it existed in his
society, too. I honestly believe that Jonas begins to feel love toward the
Giver and also Gabriel, the infant his father had been nurturing.
Another part of the story
that sticks out in my mind is when the Giver explains the importance of having
a Receiver of Memory in the community. This person takes on all the burdens and
pain of the residents, so they can live carefree lives. Quite honestly, this
reminded me of God’s grace—in that He sent His Son, Jesus, to carry our
burdens. He died on a cross as the ultimate sacrifice for our sins, so that we
may be forgiven. What a selfless, glorious act of love! Similarly, the Receiver
of Memory is devoted to his community. He so graciously takes on the weight of
the world for the people, so they do not have to suffer.
In my personal opinion, I
felt that the story ended too abruptly. The author leads us to believe that
Jonas and Gabriel made their way to “Elsewhere”. Still, we don’t know exactly
where they settled and what happened to his former community. I suppose this is
what makes the writing so exceptional. The reader is left thinking, predicting,
and questioning. Every reader may have a different interpretation and idea of
what happened, and that’s okay.
I really enjoyed the “Mark
My Words” strategy and can see that it is one that would benefit students in
regard to vocabulary development. When I was in school, I can remember copying
definitions from the dictionary. This did not help me to internalize the words
or retain them. With this strategy, I would have students choose words they are
not familiar with, but also encourage them to use the words throughout the
week. Here are the words I chose from The Giver.
·
wheedle: p. 5
(coax or entice)
·
nondescript:
p. 24 (no outstanding features)
·
torrent: p. 81
(rushing)
·
rueful: p. 154
(inspiring pity)
Here are some “big
questions” I’d use to facilitate discussion with this book:
1.
Would you like
living in a community free from pain and suffering? Would you like living in a community that had no true joy or happiness?
2.
How would you
feel if you were chosen to take on the pain (and joy) for all of Owensboro,
Kentucky?
3.
Why do you
think the author ended the story so abruptly?
4.
What do you
think happened to Jonas and Gabriel? What do you think happened to his former
community? What leads you to think this?
No comments:
Post a Comment